×

PSPof 531 - Marc Yeston Redux - Navigating Safety: The Fine Line Between Manipulation and Design

PreAccident Investigation Podcast

The Pre Accident Podcast is an ongoing discussion of Human Performance, Systems Safety, & Safety Culture.

Show Notes

Welcome to another insightful episode of the Pre-Accident Podcast hosted by Todd Conklin! In this engaging conversation, Todd shares his recent extensive travels across Europe and Asia, the exhaustion that follows, and the reflections it brought. This episode takes a closer look at the intriguing debate of whether the methods used in workplace safety are merely manipulative or cleverly designed for efficiency and security.


Through a dynamic discussion with Marc Yeston, Todd explores the implications of context-driven behavior in organizational settings. They dissect scenarios that highlight the subtle ways in which environments influence worker behavior, questioning whether these influences are ethical or simply essential for safety and performance.


Listeners are invited to think about their own work systems and practices and whether they facilitate safe behavior or inadvertently lead employees towards riskier decisions. This episode is not only about understanding manipulation but also appreciating thoughtful system design.


Grab a jar of Milo's Tea, sit back, and enjoy this thought-provoking dialogue that challenges our perceptions of safety and efficiency in the workplace. Join Todd and Marc as they navigate these complex discussions with humor and insight.


Show Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:00.017 --> 00:00:04.937
So, yeah, this podcast is brought to you by Milo's Sweet Tea. Milo's Sweet Tea.

00:00:05.417 --> 00:00:08.397
Made in Bessemer. Is that where it says Bessemer, Alabama?

00:00:08.637 --> 00:00:12.017
I can't read it on my glasses on, but it says no calorie, but it sure doesn't

00:00:12.017 --> 00:00:15.357
taste like no calorie. It's delish, isn't it? It's perfectly delicious.

00:00:15.697 --> 00:00:17.677
It's really good. Oh, shit. Oh.

00:00:17.200 --> 00:00:29.840
Music.

00:00:29.177 --> 00:00:32.797
Hi everybody welcome to the pre-accident podcast i am your loving host todd

00:00:32.797 --> 00:00:39.137
conklin how are you today are you good it is september the month of the bluegrass

00:00:39.137 --> 00:00:42.217
festival i know i talk about it a lot but it's because i rented a golf cart

00:00:42.217 --> 00:00:44.477
and you know any place where i can drive a golf cart.

00:00:44.717 --> 00:00:47.357
I'm in my happy place. That is my happy space.

00:00:47.617 --> 00:00:53.697
I'm happiest when I'm golf carting-ish, driving, whatever I'm trying to say.

00:00:53.917 --> 00:00:56.117
Hey, anyway, I hope the gear's going good. Can you believe it?

00:00:56.177 --> 00:00:58.377
It's the ninth month. What happened?

00:00:59.217 --> 00:01:03.697
You turn around and, zam, it's gone. I'm just coming back off gigantic travel,

00:01:04.197 --> 00:01:06.257
like Herculean travel, crazy travel.

00:01:06.357 --> 00:01:10.377
And it was crazy because a better person would have scheduled this differently,

00:01:10.377 --> 00:01:12.677
but I was in Europe and then I had to go to Asia.

00:01:12.957 --> 00:01:16.897
And I had it all worked out perfectly that I could have like three days at home in between there.

00:01:17.297 --> 00:01:21.317
Except that coming back from Europe, my plane got messed up in London and I

00:01:21.317 --> 00:01:25.437
got trapped 20 minutes at a time. They wouldn't just tell me it was delayed.

00:01:25.857 --> 00:01:29.837
It was, we'll be going in 20 minutes or in 20 minutes, this thing will fly in

00:01:29.837 --> 00:01:31.877
20 minutes, 20 minutes at a time.

00:01:31.997 --> 00:01:34.337
We were like 10 hours late. Thank you, United.

00:01:34.737 --> 00:01:38.717
And by the time I got in, there wasn't enough time to go home for the weekend.

00:01:38.977 --> 00:01:41.977
So then I had to go directly to Asia and I had no clean clothes.

00:01:42.537 --> 00:01:45.737
Luckily, where I stay, there's lots of clean clothes.

00:01:45.857 --> 00:01:49.717
You'll hear more about this Asia trip, I'm sure, because I recorded a great

00:01:49.717 --> 00:01:53.297
podcast with some people in Asia because I was there and we were working together.

00:01:53.457 --> 00:01:54.517
And so I thought, why not?

00:01:54.877 --> 00:01:56.777
I can't think of a reason why not.

00:01:57.777 --> 00:02:01.477
And other than that, you know, I'm suffering a bit of burnout.

00:02:01.737 --> 00:02:05.097
I'll just be honest with you. I think I'm burning the candle at both ends and

00:02:05.097 --> 00:02:08.857
And it's burning towards the middle. And I can feel it.

00:02:09.237 --> 00:02:11.917
Today it hit especially hard. Darn it.

00:02:12.217 --> 00:02:17.357
I'm sure it's a combination of being jet lagged and just exhausted and not feeling

00:02:17.357 --> 00:02:20.517
good. And you know how it goes.

00:02:20.917 --> 00:02:25.517
All these things, you also suffer. But it's exciting because the world is...

00:02:26.226 --> 00:02:32.286
It's, man, companies that are doing the safety difference stuff are really getting better.

00:02:32.486 --> 00:02:35.186
I mean, they're starting to see improvement, and there's all these testimonials,

00:02:35.246 --> 00:02:38.346
and there's all these people out there in the world excited.

00:02:38.826 --> 00:02:43.126
So that part's good. I mean, you know, it's all pretty good,

00:02:43.226 --> 00:02:47.526
he says, which seems intellectually lazy, but that's kind of where I am anyway.

00:02:47.946 --> 00:02:51.226
I feel intellectually lazy. It's the September part of it.

00:02:51.646 --> 00:02:54.906
School's starting, at least in the United States, for those of us who hang out there.

00:02:54.906 --> 00:02:57.766
And so we're kind of back into the groove it's just

00:02:57.766 --> 00:03:00.566
a matter of time till weather hits us i just heard

00:03:00.566 --> 00:03:04.506
this weekend that it's supposed to be a very snowy but warm winter at least

00:03:04.506 --> 00:03:08.466
for us i don't know what that means actually lots of melting i guess so that

00:03:08.466 --> 00:03:12.506
should be fun as well and we've got a podcast for you because this is a podcast

00:03:12.506 --> 00:03:17.826
and that's why we're here and if you could tell from the introduction this podcast

00:03:17.826 --> 00:03:20.226
by the way isn't really sponsored by milo's tea tea.

00:03:20.826 --> 00:03:27.366
It's the, the, those great people at Alabama power in Tuscaloosa sent me a case

00:03:27.366 --> 00:03:30.086
of Milo's tea and I liked it.

00:03:30.146 --> 00:03:34.226
And I said, I liked it. I must've said I liked it loud enough that somebody heard me say I like it.

00:03:34.366 --> 00:03:37.086
And so the payoff was to give me some tea.

00:03:37.446 --> 00:03:41.566
So we were drinking Milo's tea when we were recording this. And that's why we

00:03:41.566 --> 00:03:42.606
did the fake sponsorship.

00:03:42.806 --> 00:03:45.846
But if I had to sponsor Milo's tea would be one I'd sponsor.

00:03:46.006 --> 00:03:48.746
It's really good. It's delicious tea. There's no question about it.

00:03:49.366 --> 00:03:53.166
Delicious is the word I would use. But I was talking with Mark Yeston.

00:03:53.646 --> 00:03:58.106
And this podcast episode is an interesting one, because this has been kind of

00:03:58.106 --> 00:04:00.026
an ongoing discussion around the five principles.

00:04:00.206 --> 00:04:04.126
So my premise is, is that we're getting kind of far away from the principles

00:04:04.126 --> 00:04:08.606
that we've initially, not we, but that were initially established to sort of

00:04:08.606 --> 00:04:12.446
look at human and organizational performance, and have been sort of the fathers

00:04:12.446 --> 00:04:14.406
and mothers of the new view.

00:04:14.706 --> 00:04:17.946
And so I've talked about the principles. In fact, I talked about them this year,

00:04:18.026 --> 00:04:19.666
and I'm working on a book on the five principles.

00:04:19.966 --> 00:04:23.646
One of those principles is the notion that context drives behavior,

00:04:24.006 --> 00:04:26.986
that behavior is a function of the organization's context.

00:04:27.666 --> 00:04:32.306
And Mark Yeston, whom you all know from his incredible experience with the Park

00:04:32.306 --> 00:04:34.366
Service and the work he does,

00:04:34.846 --> 00:04:39.886
all over the world with pre-job, post-job, he's really good with adaptive workers

00:04:39.886 --> 00:04:43.286
who work in high-risk areas, like he's great with linemen,

00:04:44.006 --> 00:04:47.786
firemen, helicopter rescue people, that kind of stuff, emergency medicine,

00:04:48.366 --> 00:04:51.326
wilderness doctors, knolls. He does all that kind of stuff, right?

00:04:51.586 --> 00:04:59.726
So he was talking to me about this idea that, in fact, if context truly drives

00:04:59.726 --> 00:05:02.646
behavior, then isn't that manipulation?

00:05:03.206 --> 00:05:07.766
And he was saying it kind of put air quotes around manipulation as if it were

00:05:07.766 --> 00:05:13.046
sort of a morally bankrupt way to manage behavior.

00:05:13.849 --> 00:05:17.809
And so that's kind of what this podcast talks about, because that's a really

00:05:17.809 --> 00:05:21.009
good question. I mean, is advertising manipulation?

00:05:21.409 --> 00:05:25.109
Well, the quick answer is yes, it is. Is the way they design grocery stores

00:05:25.109 --> 00:05:27.129
manipulation? Yeah, that's manipulation.

00:05:27.489 --> 00:05:31.929
Is the way you have to shop on Amazon if you do online shopping manipulation?

00:05:32.629 --> 00:05:37.069
People who bought this also bought this, right? All those things are there to

00:05:37.069 --> 00:05:42.869
provide context, and that context then provides behavioral stimuli.

00:05:42.869 --> 00:05:45.549
It gives you a reason to do what you do.

00:05:45.769 --> 00:05:48.809
And that really is that third principle that we talk about a lot.

00:05:49.049 --> 00:05:53.769
And whether it's manipulation, bad word, or manipulation, good word,

00:05:54.049 --> 00:05:55.829
maybe that's something we should talk about.

00:05:56.009 --> 00:06:00.249
And so that is exactly what we did. And so that is this podcast.

00:06:00.509 --> 00:06:04.129
So if I'll shut up, you could actually hear this podcast, and that would be

00:06:04.129 --> 00:06:08.529
pretty cool too. So sit back and relax, open up your jar of Milo's tea,

00:06:08.769 --> 00:06:14.789
and listen to Mark and I discuss this very idea out loud in public on this very topic.

00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:21.520
Music.

00:06:21.609 --> 00:06:25.289
Okay, so how's it going? What are you up to now?

00:06:25.629 --> 00:06:29.189
Good, Todd. It's nice to see you. It's nice to be back at the podcast studios.

00:06:29.189 --> 00:06:33.209
I love what you did with the parking lot, adding some additional spaces for

00:06:33.209 --> 00:06:34.209
all the coming and going.

00:06:34.389 --> 00:06:38.089
Although that guy that collects the fees is kind of cranky. Does it feel good to be a part of it?

00:06:38.329 --> 00:06:41.449
Oh, it's huge, yeah. You're happening in the podcast land?

00:06:42.169 --> 00:06:45.049
Yeah, I love it. It's better than like birthdays at Denny's.

00:06:45.589 --> 00:06:48.889
Birthdays at Denny's. So what you're doing with the new view stuff?

00:06:48.989 --> 00:06:50.869
What you're doing with safety stuff? What are you thinking about now?

00:06:51.449 --> 00:06:58.209
I think about this idea of talking to people about how systems influence what workers do.

00:06:58.609 --> 00:07:04.409
So that seems to be a big deal. That's one of the big five principles that context drives behavior.

00:07:05.049 --> 00:07:09.269
And you asked about that earlier this morning. What is it about that that bugs you?

00:07:10.068 --> 00:07:12.748
Well, nothing bugs me about it. Oh, sorry. I didn't mean to – I didn't want

00:07:12.748 --> 00:07:16.448
to put words in your mouth. Yeah. Let me ask it this way. Why on earth would

00:07:16.448 --> 00:07:17.288
you ask me that question?

00:07:17.828 --> 00:07:20.848
Because I'm just curious about the examples that you use when you're talking

00:07:20.848 --> 00:07:22.008
to people about this stuff.

00:07:22.088 --> 00:07:25.988
And then you brought up a couple of great examples, actually several really

00:07:25.988 --> 00:07:30.148
good examples that I think make sense. And then we kind of like tore that apart a little bit.

00:07:30.308 --> 00:07:35.548
You're starting off talking about grocery stores and how the way the grocery

00:07:35.548 --> 00:07:38.148
store is set up. You know, I mean, people frequently, if they're going on an

00:07:38.148 --> 00:07:41.768
unplanned visit to the grocery store, just going to pick up some milk, a quick in and out.

00:07:41.888 --> 00:07:45.448
And of course, the milk is strategically located as far away from the front

00:07:45.448 --> 00:07:48.008
door as possible. So you have to go buy all the cool stuff.

00:07:48.148 --> 00:07:50.348
And, you know, on your way back out with your milk, you think like,

00:07:50.408 --> 00:07:52.768
hey, here's the Hershey's syrup. Need some of that, too.

00:07:53.748 --> 00:07:56.568
And I think that people there's a transparency to it.

00:07:56.648 --> 00:08:00.308
I mean, we know that we're kind of, for lack of a better word, being manipulated.

00:08:00.308 --> 00:08:04.768
We know that we're being steered a little bit in our behavior and we kind of

00:08:04.768 --> 00:08:10.168
accept it. And then you talked about that fantastic anecdote of the bicycles

00:08:10.168 --> 00:08:12.948
getting damaged in shipping. You want to explain that real quick?

00:08:14.008 --> 00:08:17.668
That's the one where the guy was having bicycles. He was shipping them from

00:08:17.668 --> 00:08:19.008
Europe to the United States.

00:08:19.328 --> 00:08:22.668
They weren't getting damaged in shipping. They were getting damaged between

00:08:22.668 --> 00:08:27.308
the time they took them out of the transportainers and put them on like the FedEx truck. Right.

00:08:27.688 --> 00:08:32.088
And so they changed – they worried about it a long time and they thought about

00:08:32.088 --> 00:08:37.748
it and, oh, what should we do? a bigger box, stronger box, put giant fragile signs on it.

00:08:37.848 --> 00:08:41.708
And they ended up just printing a 70-inch big screen TV on the box.

00:08:42.428 --> 00:08:47.728
Right. So the box looks like it has a 70-inch TV in it, but in reality, it has a bicycle.

00:08:48.288 --> 00:08:53.888
So long story short. Super effective. Yeah, it totally worked because the stevedores,

00:08:54.068 --> 00:09:01.268
the guys who unload the transportainers, care more about 70-inch TVs than they do care about bicycles.

00:09:01.548 --> 00:09:05.728
Right. A bicycle is much less fragile than a TV, and so you might be more inclined

00:09:05.728 --> 00:09:08.288
to think, oh, I can toss this and stack them a little bit higher,

00:09:08.348 --> 00:09:10.288
but I don't want to mess up somebody's TV. Totally makes sense.

00:09:10.408 --> 00:09:16.868
But then my thought about that was if I'm the worker and I'm tossing those or

00:09:16.868 --> 00:09:20.828
being very careful with those boxes that look like they're holding someone's

00:09:20.828 --> 00:09:25.228
expensive flat screen TV and one breaks open and one's always going to break

00:09:25.228 --> 00:09:27.908
open eventually and I find a bicycle inside,

00:09:27.908 --> 00:09:29.968
I'm going to feel a little bit misled.

00:09:30.448 --> 00:09:36.248
Right. And that's the part I find interesting because you see the grocery store

00:09:36.248 --> 00:09:38.528
putting the milk in the back,

00:09:38.788 --> 00:09:45.268
right, or the expensive items at eye level or printing a TV on a bicycle box.

00:09:45.268 --> 00:09:46.528
You see that as trickery.

00:09:47.544 --> 00:09:51.224
I see it as non-transparent. See, if I go into the grocery store,

00:09:51.284 --> 00:09:55.544
I'm joining in on the – Is that how a rich guy says trickery? Well, I wouldn't know.

00:09:56.584 --> 00:10:01.384
Can I say chicanery? Chicanery is even better. Yes, it's chicanery.

00:10:02.784 --> 00:10:07.124
But no, I think like when you can understand pretty easily that the grocery

00:10:07.124 --> 00:10:10.984
store is there trying to manipulate you and sell you and there's all kinds of cool stuff there.

00:10:10.984 --> 00:10:14.984
But it's like – so let's say instead of labeling that box with a TV,

00:10:15.244 --> 00:10:18.904
you put high explosives. If you drop this, it's going to vaporize you,

00:10:18.924 --> 00:10:21.344
and then you found out there was a bicycle in the bag. You would think like,

00:10:21.464 --> 00:10:23.644
hey, man, don't they give me some credit for this kind of thing?

00:10:24.204 --> 00:10:28.664
Well, kind of. I mean, well, I actually think the high explosives would be –

00:10:28.664 --> 00:10:32.804
you're introducing a lot of confounding variables into the argument.

00:10:33.104 --> 00:10:37.624
No, I'm sorry. It's a Saturday, and we just ate some delicious Mexican food. And Milo's Sweet Tea.

00:10:37.824 --> 00:10:42.904
And Milo's Sweet Tea brought to you by Milo's Sweet Tea. I love sweet tea. Thanks, Delane.

00:10:43.444 --> 00:10:47.904
So what's interesting to me is – and I really am kind of fixated on it – is

00:10:47.904 --> 00:10:54.284
that manipulation to you, you see as less than transparent.

00:10:54.584 --> 00:10:59.024
No, I'm talking about – forgetting transparency. I'm thinking about durability.

00:10:59.864 --> 00:11:04.664
And so the minute that first box cracks open and the person loading the boxes

00:11:04.664 --> 00:11:10.564
sees that they were being influenced by a false message, the whole thing makes sense to them.

00:11:10.644 --> 00:11:14.184
But then they will know from that period forward that a box that looks like

00:11:14.184 --> 00:11:16.064
this that says TV is actually a bicycle.

00:11:16.224 --> 00:11:19.124
I don't have to be as careful with it. You know, that ruse didn't work on me.

00:11:19.564 --> 00:11:24.924
Now, take that to the other example we talked about with the additive tanks.

00:11:25.504 --> 00:11:30.204
Right. Now, I love that. That's elegant. And so describe that for the folks really quick.

00:11:30.524 --> 00:11:34.084
Okay. So imagine four long, skinny, pencil-shaped tanks.

00:11:34.264 --> 00:11:37.184
They're long and skinny tanks, and they're maybe – let's say they're 30 feet

00:11:37.184 --> 00:11:41.324
high, and they're in a row, and they're all in a line. and they're about a meter apart.

00:11:42.264 --> 00:11:45.824
That's about three feet. That's if you're left-handed. Or $1.80 Canadian.

00:11:46.004 --> 00:11:47.584
That's right. There you go. Go ahead and calculate.

00:11:48.464 --> 00:11:53.544
So I did an investigation where a person had to climb up a ladder,

00:11:54.164 --> 00:11:56.144
go to the top of the tank, check something,

00:11:56.824 --> 00:12:00.704
climb back down the ladder, go to the tank next to it, climb up that tank,

00:12:00.864 --> 00:12:03.964
go to the top and check it, climb down that ladder, go to the one next to it.

00:12:04.004 --> 00:12:05.184
There's five tanks in a row.

00:12:05.344 --> 00:12:08.884
And he had to check all five of those tanks, which means he has to climb up

00:12:08.884 --> 00:12:13.044
five ladders and down five ladders unless he stays on the tank,

00:12:13.144 --> 00:12:16.464
which would be four and a half ladders. But let's say he's coming down, so five ladders.

00:12:17.468 --> 00:12:21.888
But amazingly enough, what was happening, they're a meter apart,

00:12:22.128 --> 00:12:24.548
is the guy was jumping from tank to tank.

00:12:24.728 --> 00:12:28.948
Or even just like going from guardrail to guardrail, like having two or three

00:12:28.948 --> 00:12:31.508
points of contact and making that leap, which works every time until.

00:12:31.728 --> 00:12:34.408
Right. It didn't. Right. And, you know, so let's say you can have three points

00:12:34.408 --> 00:12:35.548
of contact the entire time.

00:12:35.728 --> 00:12:38.708
And let's say he's done it a long time and it's normally pretty safe.

00:12:38.828 --> 00:12:44.228
I mean, clearly, if it's safe like that, it's incredibly efficient because workers

00:12:44.228 --> 00:12:48.308
really count on efficiency. because if I don't have to make 10 steps today,

00:12:48.308 --> 00:12:50.228
I'm actually 10 steps ahead of tomorrow.

00:12:50.488 --> 00:12:55.868
So workers being like water are going to look for the path of least resistance. People.

00:12:56.148 --> 00:12:59.608
Right, right. Okay, people being like water are going to look for the path of

00:12:59.608 --> 00:13:01.588
least resistance. And so the guy jumped between them.

00:13:02.228 --> 00:13:04.608
So the question is, is he an idiot?

00:13:05.288 --> 00:13:10.968
Is he next on the list of LinkedIn videos that people show, which drive me bananas?

00:13:11.208 --> 00:13:15.188
Me too. All these like, look how dumb this guy is. They made scaffolding out

00:13:15.188 --> 00:13:17.968
of bamboo in India. Don't be this guy. That's right.

00:13:18.388 --> 00:13:22.528
Or, in fact, can we look at that and say the system has some influence on that?

00:13:22.768 --> 00:13:27.128
Because if the tanks were farther away apart, so let's say the tanks were 10 feet apart.

00:13:27.248 --> 00:13:31.628
Then you wouldn't consider jumping between them. Because unless you're Spider-Man, you can't do it.

00:13:32.568 --> 00:13:36.468
But last week I was at a facility and they had the same thing,

00:13:36.648 --> 00:13:39.688
five pencil-thin tanks, 30 feet high.

00:13:40.188 --> 00:13:45.768
But on one end, they had this beautiful, very gracious and casual staircase

00:13:45.768 --> 00:13:50.268
that led up with landings and a nice pitch, seven-inch rise.

00:13:50.428 --> 00:13:51.208
It was a great staircase.

00:13:51.608 --> 00:13:56.048
When you got on top of tank one, lo and behold, there was a catwalk to tank

00:13:56.048 --> 00:13:59.288
two and to tank three and to tank four and to tank five.

00:13:59.388 --> 00:14:04.008
And at tank five, there was an emergency egress, a climbing ladder with a cage

00:14:04.008 --> 00:14:06.348
and a parapet crossing. But you wouldn't be trapped.

00:14:06.448 --> 00:14:08.668
So you wouldn't be trapped on one side if the tanks blew up.

00:14:08.668 --> 00:14:13.168
And I will tell you that they will never have a person jump from tank to tank.

00:14:13.348 --> 00:14:20.228
Now, they built a system that manipulates the worker's behavior towards using the catwalk.

00:14:20.448 --> 00:14:24.368
Is that trickery? Okay, so I don't think it's trickery. Okay, is that chicanery?

00:14:24.668 --> 00:14:28.908
Chicanery. No, not even. What I think is it's fantastic and thoughtful design

00:14:28.908 --> 00:14:34.008
in the fact that the worker or the person looking at it would never be aware

00:14:34.008 --> 00:14:37.648
unless they thought about it or someone told them why it was designed that way.

00:14:37.648 --> 00:14:42.148
But once they discovered that they were using it in the way that it was designed

00:14:42.148 --> 00:14:46.768
and it was designed with that safety in mind to not – it wouldn't even occur

00:14:46.768 --> 00:14:50.448
to a worker to jump among tanks because that would actually mean more work.

00:14:51.068 --> 00:14:55.388
Then if they saw what the design was, if it was explained to them or they just

00:14:55.388 --> 00:14:58.708
realized it over time or compared it to the initial tanks you talked about with

00:14:58.708 --> 00:15:02.808
the individual ladders, they would appreciate it. They would think like –.

00:15:03.533 --> 00:15:05.573
Time was taken and design was

00:15:05.573 --> 00:15:09.773
thought to make this as safe and easy and efficient as possible for me.

00:15:10.073 --> 00:15:13.253
And of course, also for the company. And that would leave a better taste in

00:15:13.253 --> 00:15:16.833
my mouth than the box cracking open and saying, hey, it's a bicycle,

00:15:16.973 --> 00:15:20.153
not a TV, even though it works. And yet I would suggest it's the same thing.

00:15:20.333 --> 00:15:23.513
And so if you look at principle three, context drives behavior.

00:15:24.353 --> 00:15:28.733
The sort of the metric I would use, the definition I would use for that is we

00:15:28.733 --> 00:15:34.193
should make it easy for the worker to do it safely and hard for the worker to do it dangerously. Yes.

00:15:34.593 --> 00:15:39.473
Okay. So if we do that, right, then we're actually building towards the collective

00:15:39.473 --> 00:15:41.453
goal of both the worker and the organization.

00:15:41.813 --> 00:15:44.673
But in fact, the organization is getting exactly what it wants.

00:15:44.733 --> 00:15:50.653
It's getting safe and reliable performance without injury and all five tanks get checked. Right.

00:15:51.093 --> 00:15:54.893
So is that bad? No, I don't think it's bad. But grocery stores are bad.

00:15:54.893 --> 00:15:56.433
No, I don't think grocery stores are bad.

00:15:56.553 --> 00:15:59.893
I think they're varying levels of perception.

00:16:00.133 --> 00:16:03.673
So let me ask this. Is advertising immoral? No, I don't think so.

00:16:04.451 --> 00:16:07.631
Especially not the Geico ads. I love that lizard, all the stuff they're doing.

00:16:07.651 --> 00:16:11.791
Everyone loves that lizard. Yeah. But the Geico ad, the one to watch is Flo.

00:16:12.311 --> 00:16:15.471
Yeah, yeah. She's cool, too. I think Flo is very interesting.

00:16:15.611 --> 00:16:21.631
But this notion that somehow workers exercise free agency and that every accident,

00:16:21.971 --> 00:16:26.471
LinkedIn, here it comes, is a function of the worker being stupid is,

00:16:26.671 --> 00:16:31.471
in my opinion, and I could be wrong, I actually do think that's immoral.

00:16:31.671 --> 00:16:35.551
I think that's malpractice. I think if you look at the worker and say the worker

00:16:35.551 --> 00:16:39.991
had a choice and the worker chose to do it in a dangerous way,

00:16:40.211 --> 00:16:43.791
therefore the worker got injured and somehow you're implying that the worker

00:16:43.791 --> 00:16:45.411
then therefore deserves to get injured.

00:16:46.031 --> 00:16:47.791
I don't know. I have a pretty hard time with that.

00:16:48.851 --> 00:16:53.791
So what do we do with it? I just like to work in a place that I can – once I

00:16:53.791 --> 00:16:55.851
see the design and I see the thought behind it,

00:16:55.951 --> 00:17:00.851
I realize that it's the way I probably would have done it if I had the budget

00:17:00.851 --> 00:17:04.491
and I had the engineering control over doing it. Let me ask this question. Yeah.

00:17:04.731 --> 00:17:10.351
Your entire career, you worked with guests who interfaced with national parks. We call them visitors.

00:17:10.551 --> 00:17:13.691
I'm sorry, visitors who interfaced with national parks.

00:17:14.151 --> 00:17:19.391
How did you manage their behavior to keep them from stepping on,

00:17:19.851 --> 00:17:25.631
I don't know, exotic lichen that only lives in one place or maybe turtles or,

00:17:25.671 --> 00:17:27.311
I don't know, keep them on the trail?

00:17:27.411 --> 00:17:31.911
What did you do? It's a balancing act because we would try to give people information

00:17:31.911 --> 00:17:38.751
that they could relate to without overdoing it and in doing so having them disregard it,

00:17:38.791 --> 00:17:42.791
thinking they were just being handheld and over-parented when they were visiting

00:17:42.791 --> 00:17:44.791
the parks, which is a problem.

00:17:45.051 --> 00:17:48.571
Like you stay in lots of hotels in the great state of California, right?

00:17:48.931 --> 00:17:54.031
Yes. And pretty decent hotels too, I'm sure. If you count Camp Electric as a decent hotel.

00:17:54.251 --> 00:17:58.371
And I do. And every one of those hotels you walk into has a nice-looking placard

00:17:58.371 --> 00:18:02.771
on each floor that says, there are chemicals in this hotel known by the state

00:18:02.771 --> 00:18:04.891
of California to cause birth defects and cancer.

00:18:05.471 --> 00:18:09.011
And there's absolutely nothing for you to do about that. Right. Now, you do see those.

00:18:09.351 --> 00:18:12.611
They're everywhere, by law. When you get on an airplane, same thing.

00:18:12.831 --> 00:18:15.451
And so people are bombarded by all of these messages that say,

00:18:15.511 --> 00:18:17.851
you know, the hazards are real, the hazards are real. It's very, very dangerous.

00:18:18.011 --> 00:18:22.331
And then they know in their heart, well, a lot of this is not completely true,

00:18:22.331 --> 00:18:26.871
Or a lot of this is, you know, to protect for some liability or meet some sort of like, you know,

00:18:27.291 --> 00:18:30.311
legislative or regulatory concern and doesn't truly apply to me or I'm willing

00:18:30.311 --> 00:18:33.491
to stay in this hotel and probably not going to get a birth defect because,

00:18:33.591 --> 00:18:34.451
you know, I'm already born.

00:18:35.851 --> 00:18:38.391
Yeah. Okay. That is helpful. Yeah.

00:18:39.632 --> 00:18:44.792
And so when you tell people, like, honestly, don't pet the bison, you know.

00:18:45.052 --> 00:18:51.352
Yeah, that guy got, he got, like, he got 18 days in jail or something, 20 days in jail?

00:18:51.472 --> 00:18:55.772
Yeah, some jail time and some mandatory drug and alcohol treatment and a ban

00:18:55.772 --> 00:18:59.172
from the parks for five years and all that kind of stuff. So he was drunk?

00:18:59.572 --> 00:19:02.532
He was, apparently. I mean, I guess it's been adjudicated now,

00:19:02.612 --> 00:19:05.312
but, yeah, that's what I understand from popular media reports.

00:19:05.312 --> 00:19:08.712
Speaking entirely as someone who has quite a history with Buffalo,

00:19:08.952 --> 00:19:13.232
and I don't know if you know this, podcast listeners, but I have quite a history

00:19:13.232 --> 00:19:15.752
with Buffalo. Someday I'll tell you the whole story.

00:19:16.552 --> 00:19:21.852
He was kind of a brave dude. Yeah, or very drunk. Yeah, or very drunk.

00:19:22.112 --> 00:19:25.172
And there's a fine line between very brave and very drunk.

00:19:25.172 --> 00:19:28.172
But if we're warning people in their hotel rooms, like, don't use this iron

00:19:28.172 --> 00:19:30.512
to get the wrinkles out of the clothing that you're wearing,

00:19:30.672 --> 00:19:33.152
and then we tell them don't go pet the bison,

00:19:33.672 --> 00:19:38.532
then they think maybe we're being overprotective or don't swim in the hot springs.

00:19:38.772 --> 00:19:40.432
So how do you find that balance?

00:19:41.172 --> 00:19:45.032
You can try to be as transparent as possible. And you try to tell people,

00:19:45.332 --> 00:19:49.152
you know, you try not to overwarn. Well, they went through this a bunch at Grand

00:19:49.152 --> 00:19:52.732
Canyon back in the 90s when there was a spate of heat fatalities,

00:19:52.832 --> 00:19:54.272
people just like dehydrating.

00:19:55.012 --> 00:19:59.192
They tried all kinds of approaches and they tried a heavy handed approach,

00:19:59.352 --> 00:20:01.392
like actual stop signs on the trail.

00:20:01.652 --> 00:20:06.652
Do not go past this stop sign after this time of the day because conditions are so dangerous.

00:20:06.772 --> 00:20:12.672
And if you do and you require rescue, you will be fined and humiliated and all these other things.

00:20:12.772 --> 00:20:15.032
And those lasted for a couple of years. And what we found there.

00:20:15.212 --> 00:20:19.052
How well they work. Well, what we found there is that people would go past the signs, of course.

00:20:19.212 --> 00:20:21.332
It would turn some people around. People would go past the signs and then they

00:20:21.332 --> 00:20:24.252
would get in trouble. And when they got in trouble, they were reluctant to call

00:20:24.252 --> 00:20:27.412
for assistance because they knew they were going to face all kinds of humiliation

00:20:27.412 --> 00:20:30.272
and sanction and possible fines and things like that.

00:20:30.352 --> 00:20:35.832
And they would get themselves into more trouble by not calling for help in a timely manner.

00:20:36.797 --> 00:20:39.897
So then it went more to educational campaigns.

00:20:40.077 --> 00:20:42.237
It's really interesting. I actually went to educational campaigns like,

00:20:42.237 --> 00:20:44.877
you know, hydrate or die, you know, drink, drink, drink.

00:20:45.297 --> 00:20:49.757
And then they created this unintended consequence where people were actually

00:20:49.757 --> 00:20:53.837
over-hydrating and getting into this situation that was called hyponatremia

00:20:53.837 --> 00:20:54.877
without getting too detailed.

00:20:55.037 --> 00:20:59.037
They're basically water intoxicated. They overdid it trying to comply with the rule.

00:20:59.337 --> 00:21:02.357
They'd fill themselves up with water. They'd go down there and sweat.

00:21:02.477 --> 00:21:04.417
They wouldn't eat any salty foods. And they would get into this,

00:21:04.437 --> 00:21:07.457
you know, pretty serious metabolic problem that ended up sending a whole bunch

00:21:07.457 --> 00:21:09.837
of them to the ICU for weeks at a time.

00:21:10.457 --> 00:21:14.297
And then they finally came back to a more moderate message, which is,

00:21:14.437 --> 00:21:18.117
you know, not like an enforcement thing, like go past here, you're going to get in trouble.

00:21:18.597 --> 00:21:22.857
But, you know, eat and drink as you go in and out of here and here are things to consider.

00:21:23.417 --> 00:21:27.457
And then really successfully, they actually put some, got some funding and put

00:21:27.457 --> 00:21:32.957
some, you know, volunteers and newbie rangers on the trail to just kind of talk to people.

00:21:32.957 --> 00:21:37.317
Like, hey, I see you and your Chihuahua and your Diet Pepsi are planning to

00:21:37.317 --> 00:21:40.197
hike to the bottom of the canyon. It's 135 degrees down there today.

00:21:40.297 --> 00:21:41.717
Maybe we can suggest a different hike.

00:21:41.857 --> 00:21:44.797
And they would just, in a friendly way, turn those people around and give them some education.

00:21:44.997 --> 00:21:50.457
That really, really helped. And didn't you also cache water and food along the trail?

00:21:50.997 --> 00:21:55.637
Yeah, under lock and key. I wasn't supposed to say that. Was that a secret?

00:21:55.877 --> 00:21:57.477
Yeah, that's a secret. Or we'll edit this out.

00:21:57.737 --> 00:21:59.977
Don't you worry. This will be edited out in a minute.

00:22:00.637 --> 00:22:04.677
Oreos too, Todd. Really? Yeah. Really? Because if you're telling somebody that,

00:22:04.677 --> 00:22:07.837
you know, they're going to have to spend the night down there and they're not

00:22:07.837 --> 00:22:09.657
going to get eaten by something, they're going to be okay.

00:22:09.677 --> 00:22:13.837
But nobody's going to send a night flight dirigible or helicopter down to get them.

00:22:14.217 --> 00:22:18.037
And by the way, if you key into this box, there's some water and there's some,

00:22:18.137 --> 00:22:20.557
you know, military rations.

00:22:20.917 --> 00:22:23.037
And if you look really hard, you're going to find some Oreos too.

00:22:23.137 --> 00:22:24.157
That's going to make the night go better.

00:22:25.837 --> 00:22:29.397
Well, I mean, yes. Yeah. Who would disagree with that?

00:22:30.097 --> 00:22:32.657
But please don't break into the strong boxes for the Oreos. I know.

00:22:32.837 --> 00:22:34.737
That's going to be edited out, so don't worry, Mark.

00:22:35.217 --> 00:22:39.437
You don't listen to this podcast, so you're fine. Right. In fact, it's gone now. Yes.

00:22:39.977 --> 00:22:44.917
So that's interesting. So overwarning, because I think we live in a culture

00:22:44.917 --> 00:22:49.477
where we're overwarned quite a bit about things that we can rationally see.

00:22:49.597 --> 00:22:53.677
This isn't really about protecting me. And you understand why overwarning doesn't

00:22:53.677 --> 00:22:56.077
work, do you? Yeah. So there's two things.

00:22:56.537 --> 00:23:01.797
One is the law of small numbers, which is that happens to everybody else,

00:23:01.917 --> 00:23:05.977
but the odds are actually that it won't happen to me. Correct. Right?

00:23:06.117 --> 00:23:10.697
And then couple that with an optimism bias, with the belief that I'll be fine.

00:23:10.697 --> 00:23:13.257
Right. Look at my shoes. Because I'm almost always fine. Yeah.

00:23:13.417 --> 00:23:16.537
And I can do this because I've done stuff like this before, and I've always

00:23:16.537 --> 00:23:18.017
kind of gotten away with it. All the time.

00:23:18.177 --> 00:23:21.797
Like, I can go for four hours on the Stairmaster. This is no big deal. Not that big. Yeah.

00:23:23.564 --> 00:23:29.504
That's interesting to me. So is it trickery? Is the bicycle box trickery?

00:23:30.024 --> 00:23:33.844
I think, no, I think it's really, really effective. I think it's demonstrated as effective.

00:23:34.004 --> 00:23:38.484
Yeah, I know it worked. When the curtain gets pulled back, it risks being less effective.

00:23:38.644 --> 00:23:42.764
And if the goal is to maintain that effectiveness and achieve that goal of not

00:23:42.764 --> 00:23:44.884
damaging the bicycles in this case,

00:23:45.184 --> 00:23:50.864
then once the, again, the curtain is pulled back or the mask is pulled off and they see, you know,

00:23:50.964 --> 00:23:53.544
the thinking behind it and how it was supposed to influence them,

00:23:53.564 --> 00:23:58.864
They may be less likely to comply because they know that I can mishandle this

00:23:58.864 --> 00:24:02.584
a bit because it's not really TV as opposed to if somebody said,

00:24:02.664 --> 00:24:04.944
you know, this thing that you're using, these tanks, for instance,

00:24:05.744 --> 00:24:08.924
notice how they're laid out. They're laid out to make your job easier and better.

00:24:09.524 --> 00:24:14.424
And I would feel in that case like, wow, somebody put some thought into really

00:24:14.424 --> 00:24:18.444
caring about me and didn't have to manipulate me. I hate to use the word manipulate.

00:24:18.844 --> 00:24:22.204
Well, but I'm not sure the word. It's not manipulation in a bad way.

00:24:22.204 --> 00:24:23.944
It's manipulation toward people's well-being.

00:24:24.144 --> 00:24:26.644
Let me ask this question then, Ranger Rick. Oh, here comes another one.

00:24:26.844 --> 00:24:28.884
Yeah. Are safeguards permanent?

00:24:29.924 --> 00:24:35.664
Don't think so. I think it depends. That was a super like – Wimpy.

00:24:35.924 --> 00:24:40.524
Yeah. Like if a wuss answered a question – Yes. I'm going to put an X in the center box on that.

00:24:40.704 --> 00:24:44.424
Yeah. I'd like to – on a Likert scale, I'd be at right now 3.5.

00:24:44.664 --> 00:24:49.064
There you go. It's 3.5 on a Likert scale. Modified Likert scale actually because it's just 1 to 7.

00:24:49.124 --> 00:24:53.164
That's right. Well, so everything is always degrading.

00:24:53.444 --> 00:24:57.844
Right. And so if everything's always degrading, then every safeguard you put

00:24:57.844 --> 00:25:01.324
in a system over time will fail.

00:25:01.564 --> 00:25:03.024
Break. Because it'll wear out a break.

00:25:03.264 --> 00:25:08.544
Rust. It'll definitely normalize. So we'll start to actually depend on that.

00:25:08.684 --> 00:25:11.064
And at some point, it'll become a production advantage.

00:25:11.324 --> 00:25:15.184
We'll use it to actually get work done faster. Yes.

00:25:15.944 --> 00:25:18.444
So should we stop trying? No. No.

00:25:19.873 --> 00:25:23.273
Interesting. Well, I think this is a very interesting discussion.

00:25:23.793 --> 00:25:35.133
I think mostly what this is about is does mankind exercise free agency or is

00:25:35.133 --> 00:25:41.553
mankind predetermined by larger contextual pressures that exist upon us all the time?

00:25:41.933 --> 00:25:43.793
And I'm not sure I have an answer to that.

00:25:44.533 --> 00:25:49.613
That's been getting worked on for some time now. Yeah. Maybe smart people somewhere

00:25:49.613 --> 00:25:50.693
will solve this problem.

00:25:50.813 --> 00:25:54.653
But I think leaders think, especially in retrospect,

00:25:54.933 --> 00:26:01.373
especially after something happens, that the worker actually had free will and

00:26:01.373 --> 00:26:03.673
that every decision that was made

00:26:03.673 --> 00:26:08.433
was entirely a function of the worker specifically making the decision.

00:26:08.533 --> 00:26:11.513
A rational choice. A rational choice to do something stupid. Right.

00:26:12.113 --> 00:26:19.033
And I think in context, before the event happens, I actually think many things

00:26:19.033 --> 00:26:22.073
that we see as choices are not. Are not.

00:26:22.233 --> 00:26:27.273
In fact, they're oftentimes just responses to the environment in which we find ourselves.

00:26:27.473 --> 00:26:29.693
Whether that be a grocery store

00:26:29.693 --> 00:26:34.113
or a box of bicycles. I guess there's only one bicycle in the box. Oh.

00:26:35.133 --> 00:26:40.553
Or going down a trail with a Diet Pepsi and a Chihuahua. In the Grand Canyon. Yeah.

00:26:41.273 --> 00:26:46.353
So I think we'll work for a long time. I think so. I think we have almost permanent employment.

00:26:48.173 --> 00:26:51.413
The fact that it's a moral question or a non-moral question,

00:26:51.573 --> 00:26:53.153
that's very interesting to me.

00:26:53.553 --> 00:26:56.793
And I think that's part of what we want to change is we want to help people

00:26:56.793 --> 00:27:01.513
understand that when they put a video up of a guy who knocks a loader into a

00:27:01.513 --> 00:27:06.173
ditch or something, whatever, I don't know, there's a ton of them always,

00:27:06.913 --> 00:27:11.053
that actually what that is doing is standing in moral judgment in retrospect

00:27:11.053 --> 00:27:19.113
of a worker who probably at the time was simply trying to move the digger across the ditch.

00:27:19.513 --> 00:27:22.853
Well, you know, the one that really got me going a while back,

00:27:22.873 --> 00:27:28.713
I try to restrain myself, but there was a video of a really nice Airbus and

00:27:28.713 --> 00:27:33.473
there was a tug below it and the tug caught on fire and was pretty quickly engulfed.

00:27:33.613 --> 00:27:37.273
And you know, at every airport, there are those fire extinguishers with the big wheels.

00:27:37.433 --> 00:27:40.353
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And the whole model for using those fire extinguishers is

00:27:40.353 --> 00:27:44.493
if a fire breaks out, you hit the panic button and get the response going from

00:27:44.493 --> 00:27:48.393
the on-field fire department. This was a big international airport setting,

00:27:48.393 --> 00:27:51.213
so they certainly have a fire department, but there is a response time.

00:27:51.333 --> 00:27:55.373
And the whole model for using a fire extinguisher is to try,

00:27:55.393 --> 00:27:58.833
if it's possible, to limit the.

00:27:59.700 --> 00:28:02.400
You know, the progression of that fire until they get there with the big guns

00:28:02.400 --> 00:28:05.740
or the big trucks in this case, right? Right. So here's a video of guys that

00:28:05.740 --> 00:28:07.540
are operating the tug. The thing bursts into flames.

00:28:07.900 --> 00:28:11.460
The fire extinguisher is right there. They grab it, you know,

00:28:11.540 --> 00:28:13.000
and it's windy and stuff like that.

00:28:13.060 --> 00:28:16.360
And it's a fuel fire and they're hitting it with the fuel, but they're not in

00:28:16.360 --> 00:28:18.720
PPE because that's not how fire extinguishers work.

00:28:18.820 --> 00:28:22.100
They don't come with, you know, fire retardant clothing and SCBA.

00:28:22.460 --> 00:28:26.420
It's a fire extinguisher. And so they exhaust the fire extinguisher as they're

00:28:26.420 --> 00:28:29.320
retreating and then they run away from the thing.

00:28:29.700 --> 00:28:34.340
And then the comments from that post was the first one would say,

00:28:34.420 --> 00:28:40.480
this is a clear violation of ACIO or ICAO, you know, yeah, section 41,

00:28:40.600 --> 00:28:41.920
honestly, down to the paragraph.

00:28:42.040 --> 00:28:47.540
And there was two sentences of citations of the violations that were taking

00:28:47.540 --> 00:28:52.940
place and the fact that they weren't in PPE and the fire responders didn't respond in a timely manner.

00:28:53.080 --> 00:28:56.500
And again, this whole video clip is about 18 seconds long, so I've never seen

00:28:56.500 --> 00:29:01.060
a fire department that can get to a fire in 18 seconds. But with the benefit

00:29:01.060 --> 00:29:07.160
of retrospect and this comfort share bias that we have, I don't want to call it a bias.

00:29:07.280 --> 00:29:10.920
I just think it's kind of cruel to sit there and judge those people and list

00:29:10.920 --> 00:29:13.100
like here are the idealized procedures

00:29:13.100 --> 00:29:16.320
that were not followed to my satisfaction in this case was crazy.

00:29:16.460 --> 00:29:20.740
And that's why I couldn't restrain myself when I tweeted back or I didn't tweet

00:29:20.740 --> 00:29:23.960
whatever it's called. I posted back and I said, well, maybe the fire department

00:29:23.960 --> 00:29:30.040
was delayed because they were watching a PowerPoint presentation on ICAO chapter 41-61.

00:29:30.300 --> 00:29:34.020
And then I hit sin and it felt terrible afterwards. I didn't mean to be rude to the guy.

00:29:34.140 --> 00:29:37.060
I said, man, I want your job where you just get to sit there and criticize people

00:29:37.060 --> 00:29:38.460
who are actually trying to put the fire out.

00:29:39.580 --> 00:29:43.120
That's good. But it just bugs me because I don't think it makes us any better.

00:29:43.120 --> 00:29:48.620
When you see people out there struggling in unexpected circumstances or strange

00:29:48.620 --> 00:29:51.060
combinations of really common circumstances –.

00:29:52.318 --> 00:29:57.458
You can see that they're actually trying to make sense of what's going on and do the right thing.

00:29:57.598 --> 00:30:00.618
And when it goes wrong, it's really easy to sit there and say like,

00:30:00.698 --> 00:30:03.918
well, obviously they should have chosen B instead of A. So let's bring everybody

00:30:03.918 --> 00:30:09.398
in for A over B training and fire these guys or, you know, suspend them or something like that.

00:30:09.878 --> 00:30:12.398
When in fact, that's just the way the world works every day.

00:30:12.398 --> 00:30:14.158
We're constantly having to make decisions.

00:30:14.298 --> 00:30:16.818
And I think that, you know, honest workers, and I think most workers are honest,

00:30:16.998 --> 00:30:21.178
are trying to think the next step I take is probably the absolute best thing

00:30:21.178 --> 00:30:24.698
to do in this complex situation that I'm struggling with. And they don't know

00:30:24.698 --> 00:30:25.478
that it's going to be bad.

00:30:25.598 --> 00:30:29.078
And we don't know it's going to be bad until it doesn't work.

00:30:29.298 --> 00:30:35.078
Had that fire extinguisher put out that fire, those guys would have been heroes. Nobody got hurt.

00:30:35.398 --> 00:30:37.418
I mean, plane got burnt up pretty good.

00:30:37.778 --> 00:30:42.758
But, you know, they did exactly what the system was designed to do.

00:30:43.118 --> 00:30:46.078
And that, my friend, the best definition of

00:30:46.078 --> 00:30:48.938
local rationale I've ever heard is a pretty good place

00:30:48.938 --> 00:30:51.698
to stop this podcast thank you mark well thanks todd

00:30:51.698 --> 00:30:57.978
you're welcome talk to you soon see ya and that

00:30:57.978 --> 00:31:01.738
is the podcast for today what do you think would you change your life do your

00:31:01.738 --> 00:31:05.638
life feel changed yeah turn turn the sound up a little it was fun that was a

00:31:05.638 --> 00:31:08.918
great conversation it's always fun to spend time with mark he's great give him

00:31:08.918 --> 00:31:13.618
a call if you've not worked with him you should he is a fun guy fun fun fun

00:31:13.618 --> 00:31:16.098
fun fun all right so that's the podcast talk to you.

00:31:16.578 --> 00:31:19.698
Wednesday, and then maybe again Saturday, and then Wednesday, and then Saturday.

00:31:19.958 --> 00:31:22.798
We do this kind of a lot, don't we? If you're new to the podcast,

00:31:22.958 --> 00:31:25.618
thanks for listening. If you've listened for a while, tell your friends.

00:31:26.138 --> 00:31:28.918
Tell your friends and subscribe. That makes a big difference.

00:31:29.298 --> 00:31:32.738
Until then, learn something new every single day. Have as much fun as you possibly

00:31:32.738 --> 00:31:33.858
can, and for goodness sakes.

00:31:34.480 --> 00:31:44.845
Music.

Contact Us

×

Got a question, press inquiry or idea you'd like to share? Contact us through the form below and let us know how we can help.

Subscribe, don't miss the next episode!

×